RiskGraph ↗
Explore
Report evidence & compare riskApplicationsEnterprise · EraRisk & useful workAction recorderResearch & validationPrivacy & knowledge riskHow to use thisProduct filmFresh retrieval experimentMemory & mistake riskFailure discoveryImport reviewed tracesSource & loss projectionCritic diagnosticsEstimator checkMethod & assumptions

FRESH MATCHED RETRIEVAL EXPERIMENT

Which setup makes fewer mistakes?

The same hard trips. Two models. Three ways to supply guidance, with and without a critic.

Loading recorded results…

Blue: Haiku. Coral: Sonnet. Points and thin ranges: estimated probabilities and 95% model-based ranges. Bayesian methods update these estimates from reviewed outcomes. Pale bars: simultaneous 95% confidence bounds across all 12 setups, task error and the loss-exceedance curve. Click a row to inspect it.

Inspect a setup

Inspect a recorded mistake
Which mistakes occurred?
Timing, tokens and cost

What the three setups receive

Methods and evidence

Frozen protocol ↗ · Experiment & results ↗

Proposed losses use synthetic cancellation and rebooking penalties capped at $1,000, before the execution gate. Unnecessary escalation counts as a task error even with no dollar loss. Missing losses span $0–$1,000. Deployment projections require traffic and untested-failure assumptions.